next up previous contents
Next: Relation between and Up: Position switched Previous: Position switched   Contents

Two key points: 1) Sharing OFF among many ONs and 2) system stability timescale

When the stability of the system is long enough, we can share the same off for several independent on-positions measured in a row (e.g. ON-ON-ON-OFF-ON-ON-ON-OFF...). The first key point here is the fact that the on-positions must be independent. The OTF is an observing mode where the sharing of the off can be used because the goal is to map a given region of the sky made of independent positions or resolution elements. When sharing the off-position between several on, Ball (1976) showed that the optimal off integration time is

\begin{displaymath}
\ensuremath{t_\ensuremath{\mathrm{off}}}^\ensuremath{\mathr...
...mathrm{on/off}}}} \, \ensuremath{t_\ensuremath{\mathrm{on}}}
\end{displaymath} (23)

where \ensuremath{n_\ensuremath{\mathrm{on/off}}} is the number of on measurements per off. Replacing \ensuremath{t_\ensuremath{\mathrm{off}}} by its optimal value in eq. [*], we obtain
\begin{displaymath}
\ensuremath{t_\ensuremath{\mathrm{sig}}}= \frac{\ensuremath...
...rac{1}{\sqrt{\ensuremath{n_\ensuremath{\mathrm{on/off}}}}}}.
\end{displaymath} (24)

We thus see that the rms noise decreases when the number of independent on per off increases. It seems tempting to have only one off for all the on positions of the OTF map. However, the second key point of the method is that the system must be stable between the first and last on measurement. To take this point into account we must introduce We note that the number of on per off ( \ensuremath{n_\ensuremath{\mathrm{on/off}}}) is a purely geometrical quantity. This implies that the time spent off is linked to the time spent on by Eq. [*] both in each individual coverage and when averaging all the coverages.


next up previous contents
Next: Relation between and Up: Position switched Previous: Position switched   Contents
Gildas manager 2014-07-01